- Test Design
-
RSpec
- General guidelines
- Eager loading the application code
- Ruby warnings
- Test order
- Test flakiness
-
Test slowness
- Don’t request capabilities you don’t need
- Profiling: see where your test spend its time
- Optimize factory usage
- Stubbing methods within factories
- Stubbing member access level
- Additional profiling metrics
- Troubleshoot slow feature test
- Identify slow tests
- Avoid repeating expensive actions
- In case you’re stuck
- Feature category metadata
- Tests depending on EE license
- Tests depending on SaaS
- Coverage
- System / Feature tests
- Fast unit tests
-
subject
andlet
variables - Common test setup
- Time-sensitive tests
- Feature flags in tests
- Pristine test environments
- Table-based / Parameterized tests
- Prometheus tests
- Matchers
- Testing query performance
- Shared contexts
- Shared examples
- Helpers
- Testing Ruby constants
- Factories
- Fixtures
- Repositories
- Configuration
- Test environment logging
Testing best practices
Test Design
Testing at GitLab is a first class citizen, not an afterthought. It’s important we consider the design of our tests as we do the design of our features.
When implementing a feature, we think about developing the right capabilities the right way. This helps us narrow our scope to a manageable level. When implementing tests for a feature, we must think about developing the right tests, but then cover all the important ways the test may fail. This can quickly widen our scope to a level that is difficult to manage.
Test heuristics can help solve this problem. They concisely address many of the common ways bugs manifest themselves in our code. When designing our tests, take time to review known test heuristics to inform our test design. We can find some helpful heuristics documented in the Handbook in the Test Engineering section.
RSpec
To run RSpec tests:
# run test for a file
bin/rspec spec/models/project_spec.rb
# run test for the example on line 10 on that file
bin/rspec spec/models/project_spec.rb:10
# run tests matching the example name has that string
bin/rspec spec/models/project_spec.rb -e associations
# run all tests, will take hours for GitLab codebase!
bin/rspec
Use Guard to continuously monitor for changes and only run matching tests:
bundle exec guard
When using spring and guard together, use SPRING=1 bundle exec guard
instead to make use of spring.
General guidelines
- Use a single, top-level
RSpec.describe ClassName
block. - Use
.method
to describe class methods and#method
to describe instance methods. - Use
context
to test branching logic (RSpec/AvoidConditionalStatements
RuboCop Cop - MR). - Try to match the ordering of tests to the ordering in the class.
- Try to follow the Four-Phase Test pattern, using newlines to separate phases.
- Use
Gitlab.config.gitlab.host
rather than hard coding'localhost'
. - For literal URLs in tests, use
example.com
,gitlab.example.com
. This will ensure that we do not utilize any real URLs. - Don’t assert against the absolute value of a sequence-generated attribute (see Gotchas).
- Avoid using
expect_any_instance_of
orallow_any_instance_of
(see Gotchas). - Don’t supply the
:each
argument to hooks because it’s the default. - On
before
andafter
hooks, prefer it scoped to:context
over:all
. - When using
evaluate_script("$('.js-foo').testSomething()")
(orexecute_script
) which acts on a given element, use a Capybara matcher beforehand (such asfind('.js-foo')
) to ensure the element actually exists. - Use
focus: true
to isolate parts of the specs you want to run. - Use
:aggregate_failures
when there is more than one expectation in a test. - For empty test description blocks, use
specify
rather thanit do
if the test is self-explanatory. - Use
non_existing_record_id
/non_existing_record_iid
/non_existing_record_access_level
when you need an ID/IID/access level that doesn’t actually exist. Using 123, 1234, or even 999 is brittle as these IDs could actually exist in the database in the context of a CI run.
Eager loading the application code
By default, the application code:
- Isn’t eagerly loaded in the
test
environment. - Is eagerly loaded in CI/CD (when
ENV['CI'].present?
) to surface any potential loading issues.
If you need to enable eager loading when executing tests,
use the GITLAB_TEST_EAGER_LOAD
environment variable:
GITLAB_TEST_EAGER_LOAD=1 bin/rspec spec/models/project_spec.rb
If your test depends on all the application code that is being loaded, add the :eager_load
tag.
This ensures that the application code is eagerly loaded before the test execution.
Ruby warnings
We’ve enabled deprecation warnings by default when running specs. Making these warnings more visible to developers helps upgrading to newer Ruby versions.
You can silence deprecation warnings by setting the environment variable
SILENCE_DEPRECATIONS
, for example:
# silence all deprecation warnings
SILENCE_DEPRECATIONS=1 bin/rspec spec/models/project_spec.rb
Test order
- Introduced in GitLab 15.4.
All new spec files are run in random order to surface flaky tests that are dependent on test order.
When randomized:
- The string
# order random
is added below the example group description. - The used seed is shown in the spec output below the test suite summary. For example,
Randomized with seed 27443
.
For a list of spec files which are still run in defined order, see rspec_order_todo.yml
.
To make spec files run in random order, check their order dependency with:
scripts/rspec_check_order_dependence spec/models/project_spec.rb
If the specs pass the check the script removes them from
rspec_order_todo.yml
automatically.
If the specs fail the check they must be fixed before than can run in random order.
Test flakiness
Test slowness
GitLab has a massive test suite that, without parallelization, can take hours to run. It’s important that we make an effort to write tests that are accurate and effective as well as fast.
Test performance is important to maintaining quality and velocity, and has a direct impact on CI build times and thus fixed costs. We want thorough, correct, and fast tests. Here you can find some information about tools and techniques available to you to achieve that.
Don’t request capabilities you don’t need
We make it easy to add capabilities to our examples by annotating the example or a parent context. Examples of these are:
-
:js
in feature specs, which runs a full JavaScript capable headless browser. -
:clean_gitlab_redis_cache
which provides a clean Redis cache to the examples. -
:request_store
which provides a request store to the examples.
We should reduce test dependencies, and avoiding capabilities also reduces the amount of set-up needed.
:js
is particularly important to avoid. This must only be used if the feature
test requires JavaScript reactivity in the browser (for example, clicking a Vue.js component). Using a headless
browser is much slower than parsing the HTML response from the app.
Profiling: see where your test spend its time
rspec-stackprof
can be used to generate a flame graph that shows you where you test spend its time.
The gem generates a JSON report that we can upload to https://www.speedscope.app for an interactive visualization.
Installation
stackprof
gem is already installed with GitLab, and we also have a script available that generates the JSON report (bin/rspec-stackprof
).
# Optional: install the `speedscope` package to easily upload the JSON report to https://www.speedscope.app
npm install -g speedscope
Generate the JSON report
bin/rspec-stackprof --speedscope=true <your_slow_spec>
# There will be the name of the report displayed when the script ends.
# Upload the JSON report to speedscope.app
speedscope tmp/<your-json-report>.json
How to interpret the flamegraph
Below are some useful tips to interpret and navigate the flamegraph:
- There are several views available for the flamegraph.
Left Heavy
is particularly useful when there are a lot of function calls (for example, feature specs). - You can zoom in or out! See the navigation documentation
- If you are working on a slow feature test, search for
Capybara::DSL#
in the search to see the capybara actions that are made, and how long they take!
See #414929 or #375004 for some analysis examples.
Optimize factory usage
A common cause of slow tests is excessive creation of objects, and thus computation and DB time. Factories are essential to development, but they can make inserting data into the DB so easy that we may be able to optimize.
The two basic techniques to bear in mind here are:
- Reduce: avoid creating objects, and avoid persisting them.
- Reuse: shared objects, especially nested ones we do not examine, can generally be shared.
To avoid creation, it is worth bearing in mind that:
-
instance_double
andspy
are faster thanFactoryBot.build(...)
. -
FactoryBot.build(...)
and.build_stubbed
are faster than.create
. - Don’t
create
an object when you can usebuild
,build_stubbed
,attributes_for
,spy
, orinstance_double
. Database persistence is slow!
Use Factory Doctor to find cases where database persistence is not needed in a given test.
Examples of factories optimization 1, 2.
# run test for path
FDOC=1 bin/rspec spec/[path]/[to]/[spec].rb
A common change is to use build
or build_stubbed
instead of create
:
# Old
let(:project) { create(:project) }
# New
let(:project) { build(:project) }
Factory Profiler can help to identify repetitive database persistence via factories.
# run test for path
FPROF=1 bin/rspec spec/[path]/[to]/[spec].rb
# to visualize with a flamegraph
FPROF=flamegraph bin/rspec spec/[path]/[to]/[spec].rb
A common cause of a large number of created factories is factory cascades, which result when factories create and recreate associations.
They can be identified by a noticeable difference between total time
and top-level time
numbers:
total top-level total time time per call top-level time name
208 0 9.5812s 0.0461s 0.0000s namespace
208 76 37.4214s 0.1799s 13.8749s project
The table above shows us that we never create any namespace
objects explicitly
(top-level == 0
) - they are all created implicitly for us. But we still end up
with 208 of them (one for each project) and this takes 9.5 seconds.
In order to reuse a single object for all calls to a named factory in implicit parent associations,
FactoryDefault
can be used:
RSpec.describe API::Search, factory_default: :keep do
let_it_be(:namespace) { create_default(:namespace) }
Then every project we create uses this namespace
, without us having to pass
it as namespace: namespace
. In order to make it work along with let_it_be
, factory_default: :keep
must be explicitly specified. That keeps the default factory for every example in a suite instead of
recreating it for each example.
To prevent accidental reliance between test examples, objects created
with create_default
are
frozen.
Maybe we don’t need to create 208 different projects - we can create one and reuse it. In addition, we can see that only about 1/3 of the projects we create are ones we ask for (76/208). There is benefit in setting a default value for projects as well:
let_it_be(:project) { create_default(:project) }
In this case, the total time
and top-level time
numbers match more closely:
total top-level total time time per call top-level time name
31 30 4.6378s 0.1496s 4.5366s project
8 8 0.0477s 0.0477s 0.0477s namespace
Let’s talk about let
There are various ways to create objects and store them in variables in your tests. They are, from least efficient to most efficient:
-
let!
creates the object before each example runs. It also creates a new object for every example. You should only use this option if you need to create a clean object before each example without explicitly referring to it. -
let
lazily creates the object. It isn’t created until the object is called.let
is generally inefficient as it creates a new object for every example.let
is fine for simple values. However, more efficient variants oflet
are best when dealing with database models such as factories. -
let_it_be_with_refind
works similar tolet_it_be_with_reload
, but the former callsActiveRecord::Base#find
instead ofActiveRecord::Base#reload
.reload
is usually faster thanrefind
. -
let_it_be_with_reload
creates an object one time for all examples in the same context, but after each example, the database changes are rolled back, andobject.reload
will be called to restore the object to its original state. This means you can make changes to the object before or during an example. However, there are cases where state leaks across other models can occur. In these cases,let
may be an easier option, especially if only a few examples exist. -
let_it_be
creates an object one time for all of the examples in the same context. This is a great alternative tolet
andlet!
for objects that do not need to change from one example to another. Usinglet_it_be
can dramatically speed up tests that create database models. See https://github.com/test-prof/test-prof/blob/master/docs/recipes/let_it_be.md#let-it-be for more details and examples.
Pro-tip: When writing tests, it is best to consider the objects inside a let_it_be
as immutable, as there are some important caveats when modifying objects inside a let_it_be
declaration (1, 2). To make your let_it_be
objects immutable, consider using freeze: true
:
# Before
let_it_be(:namespace) { create_default(:namespace) }
# After
let_it_be(:namespace, freeze: true) { create_default(:namespace) }
See https://github.com/test-prof/test-prof/blob/master/docs/recipes/let_it_be.md#state-leakage-detection for more information on let_it_be
freezing.
let_it_be
is the most optimized option since it instantiates an object once and shares its instance across examples. If you find yourself needing let
instead of let_it_be
, try let_it_be_with_reload
.
# Old
let(:project) { create(:project) }
# New
let_it_be(:project) { create(:project) }
# If you need to expect changes to the object in the test
let_it_be_with_reload(:project) { create(:project) }
Here is an example of when let_it_be
cannot be used, but let_it_be_with_reload
allows for more efficiency than let
:
let_it_be(:user) { create(:user) }
let_it_be_with_reload(:project) { create(:project) } # The test will fail if `let_it_be` is used
context 'with a developer' do
before do
project.add_developer(user)
end
it 'project has an owner and a developer' do
expect(project.members.map(&:access_level)).to match_array([Gitlab::Access::OWNER, Gitlab::Access::DEVELOPER])
end
end
context 'with a maintainer' do
before do
project.add_maintainer(user)
end
it 'project has an owner and a maintainer' do
expect(project.members.map(&:access_level)).to match_array([Gitlab::Access::OWNER, Gitlab::Access::MAINTAINER])
end
end
Stubbing methods within factories
You should avoid using allow(object).to receive(:method)
in factories, as this makes the factory unable to be used with let_it_be
, as described in common test setup.
Instead, you can use stub_method
to stub the method:
before(:create) do |user, evaluator|
# Stub a method.
stub_method(user, :some_method) { 'stubbed!' }
# Or with arguments, including named ones
stub_method(user, :some_method) { |var1| "Returning #{var1}!" }
stub_method(user, :some_method) { |var1: 'default'| "Returning #{var1}!" }
end
# Un-stub the method.
# This may be useful where the stubbed object is created with `let_it_be`
# and you want to reset the method between tests.
after(:create) do |user, evaluator|
restore_original_method(user, :some_method)
# or
restore_original_methods(user)
end
stub_method
does not work when used in conjunction with let_it_be_with_refind
. This is because stub_method
will stub a method on an instance and let_it_be_with_refind
will create a new instance of the object for each run.stub_method
does not support method existence and method arity checks.
stub_method
is supposed to be used in factories only. It’s strongly discouraged to be used elsewhere. Consider using RSpec mocks if available.Stubbing member access level
To stub member access level for factory stubs like Project
or Group
use
stub_member_access_level
:
let(:project) { build_stubbed(:project) }
let(:maintainer) { build_stubbed(:user) }
let(:policy) { ProjectPolicy.new(maintainer, project) }
it 'allows admin_project ability' do
stub_member_access_level(project, maintainer: maintainer)
expect(policy).to be_allowed(:admin_project)
end
project_authorizations
or Member
records. Use Project#add_member
or Group#add_member
instead.Additional profiling metrics
We can use the rspec_profiling
gem to diagnose, for instance, the number of SQL queries we’re making when running a test.
This could be caused by some application side SQL queries triggered by a test that could mock parts that are not under test (for example, !123810).
See the instructions in the performance docs.
Troubleshoot slow feature test
A slow feature test can generally be optimized the same way as any other test. However, there are some specific techniques that can make the troubleshooting session more fruitful.
See what the feature test is doing in the UI
# Before
bin/rspec ./spec/features/admin/admin_settings_spec.rb:992
# After
WEBDRIVER_HEADLESS=0 bin/rspec ./spec/features/admin/admin_settings_spec.rb:992
See Run :js
spec in a visible browser for more info.
Search for Capybara::DSL#
when using profiling
When using stackprof
flamegraphs, search for Capybara::DSL#
in the search to see the capybara actions that are made, and how long they take!
Identify slow tests
Running a spec with profiling is a good way to start optimizing a spec. This can be done with:
bundle exec rspec --profile -- path/to/spec_file.rb
Which includes information like the following:
Top 10 slowest examples (10.69 seconds, 7.7% of total time):
Issue behaves like an editable mentionable creates new cross-reference notes when the mentionable text is edited
1.62 seconds ./spec/support/shared_examples/models/mentionable_shared_examples.rb:164
Issue relative positioning behaves like a class that supports relative positioning .move_nulls_to_end manages to move nulls to the end, stacking if we cannot create enough space
1.39 seconds ./spec/support/shared_examples/models/relative_positioning_shared_examples.rb:88
Issue relative positioning behaves like a class that supports relative positioning .move_nulls_to_start manages to move nulls to the end, stacking if we cannot create enough space
1.27 seconds ./spec/support/shared_examples/models/relative_positioning_shared_examples.rb:180
Issue behaves like an editable mentionable behaves like a mentionable extracts references from its reference property
0.99253 seconds ./spec/support/shared_examples/models/mentionable_shared_examples.rb:69
Issue behaves like an editable mentionable behaves like a mentionable creates cross-reference notes
0.94987 seconds ./spec/support/shared_examples/models/mentionable_shared_examples.rb:101
Issue behaves like an editable mentionable behaves like a mentionable when there are cached markdown fields sends in cached markdown fields when appropriate
0.94148 seconds ./spec/support/shared_examples/models/mentionable_shared_examples.rb:86
Issue behaves like an editable mentionable when there are cached markdown fields when the markdown cache is stale persists the refreshed cache so that it does not have to be refreshed every time
0.92833 seconds ./spec/support/shared_examples/models/mentionable_shared_examples.rb:153
Issue behaves like an editable mentionable when there are cached markdown fields refreshes markdown cache if necessary
0.88153 seconds ./spec/support/shared_examples/models/mentionable_shared_examples.rb:130
Issue behaves like an editable mentionable behaves like a mentionable generates a descriptive back-reference
0.86914 seconds ./spec/support/shared_examples/models/mentionable_shared_examples.rb:65
Issue#related_issues returns only authorized related issues for given user
0.84242 seconds ./spec/models/issue_spec.rb:335
Finished in 2 minutes 19 seconds (files took 1 minute 4.42 seconds to load)
277 examples, 0 failures, 1 pending
From this result, we can see the most expensive examples in our spec, giving us a place to start. The most expensive examples here are in shared examples; any reductions generally have a larger impact as they are called in multiple places.
Avoid repeating expensive actions
While isolated examples are very clear, and help serve the purpose of specs as specification, the following example shows how we can combine expensive actions:
subject { described_class.new(arg_0, arg_1) }
it 'creates an event' do
expect { subject.execute }.to change(Event, :count).by(1)
end
it 'sets the frobulance' do
expect { subject.execute }.to change { arg_0.reset.frobulance }.to('wibble')
end
it 'schedules a background job' do
expect(BackgroundJob).to receive(:perform_async)
subject.execute
end
If the call to subject.execute
is expensive, then we are repeating the same
action just to make different assertions. We can reduce this repetition by
combining the examples:
it 'performs the expected side-effects' do
expect(BackgroundJob).to receive(:perform_async)
expect { subject.execute }
.to change(Event, :count).by(1)
.and change { arg_0.frobulance }.to('wibble')
end
Be careful doing this, as this sacrifices clarity and test independence for performance gains.
When combining tests, consider using :aggregate_failures
, so that the full
results are available, and not just the first failure.
In case you’re stuck
We have a backend_testing_performance
domain expertise to list people that could help refactor slow backend specs.
To find people that could help, search for backend testing performance
on the Engineering Projects page, or look directly in the www-gitlab-org
project.
Feature category metadata
You must set feature category metadata for each RSpec example.
Tests depending on EE license
You can use if: Gitlab.ee?
or unless: Gitlab.ee?
on context/spec blocks to execute tests depending on whether running with FOSS_ONLY=1
.
Example: SchemaValidator reads a different path depending on the license
Tests depending on SaaS
You can use the :saas
RSpec metadata tag helper on context/spec blocks to test code that only runs on GitLab.com. This helper sets Gitlab.config.gitlab['url']
to Gitlab::Saas.com_url
.
Coverage
simplecov
is used to generate code test coverage reports.
These are generated automatically on the CI, but not when running tests locally. To generate partial reports
when you run a spec file on your machine, set the SIMPLECOV
environment variable:
SIMPLECOV=1 bundle exec rspec spec/models/repository_spec.rb
Coverage reports are generated into the coverage
folder in the app root, and you can open these in your browser, for example:
firefox coverage/index.html
Use the coverage reports to ensure your tests cover 100% of your code.
System / Feature tests
- Feature specs should be named
ROLE_ACTION_spec.rb
, such asuser_changes_password_spec.rb
. - Use scenario titles that describe the success and failure paths.
- Avoid scenario titles that add no information, such as “successfully”.
- Avoid scenario titles that repeat the feature title.
- Create only the necessary records in the database
- Test a happy path and a less happy path but that’s it
- Every other possible path should be tested with Unit or Integration tests
- Test what’s displayed on the page, not the internals of ActiveRecord models.
For instance, if you want to verify that a record was created, add
expectations that its attributes are displayed on the page, not that
Model.count
increased by one. - It’s ok to look for DOM elements, but don’t abuse it, because it makes the tests more brittle
UI testing
When testing the UI, write tests that simulate what a user sees and how they interact with the UI. This means preferring Capybara’s semantic methods and avoiding querying by IDs, classes, or attributes.
The benefits of testing in this way are that:
- It ensures all interactive elements have an accessible name.
- It is more readable, as it uses more natural language.
- It is less brittle, as it avoids querying by IDs, classes, and attributes, which are not visible to the user.
We strongly recommend that you query by the element’s text label instead of by ID, class name, or data-testid
.
If needed, you can scope interactions within a specific area of the page by using within
.
As you will likely be scoping to an element such as a div
, which typically does not have a label,
you may use a data-testid
selector in this case.
You can use the be_axe_clean
matcher to run axe automated accessibility testing in feature tests.
Externalized contents
For RSpec tests, expectations against externalized contents should call the same
externalizing method to match the translation. For example, you should use the _
method in Ruby.
See Internationalization for GitLab - Test files (RSpec) for details.
Actions
Where possible, use more specific actions, such as the ones below.
# good
click_button _('Submit review')
click_link _('UI testing docs')
fill_in _('Search projects'), with: 'gitlab' # fill in text input with text
select _('Updated date'), from: 'Sort by' # select an option from a select input
check _('Checkbox label')
uncheck _('Checkbox label')
choose _('Radio input label')
attach_file(_('Attach a file'), '/path/to/file.png')
# bad - interactive elements must have accessible names, so
# we should be able to use one of the specific actions above
find('.group-name', text: group.name).click
find('.js-show-diff-settings').click
find('[data-testid="submit-review"]').click
find('input[type="checkbox"]').click
find('.search').native.send_keys('gitlab')
Finders
Where possible, use more specific finders, such as the ones below.
# good
find_button _('Submit review')
find_button _('Submit review'), disabled: true
find_link _('UI testing docs')
find_link _('UI testing docs'), href: docs_url
find_field _('Search projects')
find_field _('Search projects'), with: 'gitlab' # find the input field with text
find_field _('Search projects'), disabled: true
find_field _('Checkbox label'), checked: true
find_field _('Checkbox label'), unchecked: true
# acceptable when finding a element that is not a button, link, or field
find_by_testid('element')
Matchers
Where possible, use more specific matchers, such as the ones below.
# good
expect(page).to have_button _('Submit review')
expect(page).to have_button _('Submit review'), disabled: true
expect(page).to have_button _('Notifications'), class: 'is-checked' # assert the "Notifications" GlToggle is checked
expect(page).to have_link _('UI testing docs')
expect(page).to have_link _('UI testing docs'), href: docs_url # assert the link has an href
expect(page).to have_field _('Search projects')
expect(page).to have_field _('Search projects'), disabled: true
expect(page).to have_field _('Search projects'), with: 'gitlab' # assert the input field has text
expect(page).to have_checked_field _('Checkbox label')
expect(page).to have_unchecked_field _('Radio input label')
expect(page).to have_select _('Sort by')
expect(page).to have_select _('Sort by'), selected: 'Updated date' # assert the option is selected
expect(page).to have_select _('Sort by'), options: ['Updated date', 'Created date', 'Due date'] # assert an exact list of options
expect(page).to have_select _('Sort by'), with_options: ['Created date', 'Due date'] # assert a partial list of options
expect(page).to have_text _('Some paragraph text.')
expect(page).to have_text _('Some paragraph text.'), exact: true # assert exact match
expect(page).to have_current_path 'gitlab/gitlab-test/-/issues'
expect(page).to have_title _('Not Found')
# acceptable when a more specific matcher above is not possible
expect(page).to have_css 'h2', text: 'Issue title'
expect(page).to have_css 'p', text: 'Issue description', exact: true
expect(page).to have_css '[data-testid="weight"]', text: 2
expect(page).to have_css '.atwho-view ul', visible: true
Interacting with modals
Use the within_modal
helper to interact with GitLab UI modals.
include Spec::Support::Helpers::ModalHelpers
within_modal do
expect(page).to have_link _('UI testing docs')
fill_in _('Search projects'), with: 'gitlab'
click_button 'Continue'
end
Furthermore, you can use accept_gl_confirm
for confirmation modals that only need to be accepted.
This is helpful when migrating window.confirm()
to confirmAction
.
include Spec::Support::Helpers::ModalHelpers
accept_gl_confirm do
click_button 'Delete user'
end
You can also pass the expected confirmation message and button text to accept_gl_confirm
.
include Spec::Support::Helpers::ModalHelpers
accept_gl_confirm('Are you sure you want to delete this user?', button_text: 'Delete') do
click_button 'Delete user'
end
Other useful methods
After you retrieve an element using a finder method, you can invoke a number of
element methods
on it, such as hover
.
Capybara tests also have a number of session methods available, such as accept_confirm
.
Some other useful methods are shown below:
refresh # refresh the page
send_keys([:shift, 'i']) # press Shift+I keys to go to the Issues dashboard page
current_window.resize_to(1000, 1000) # resize the window
scroll_to(find_field('Comment')) # scroll to an element
You can also find a number of GitLab custom helpers in the spec/support/helpers/
directory.
Live debug
Sometimes you may need to debug Capybara tests by observing browser behavior.
You can pause Capybara and view the website on the browser by using the
live_debug
method in your spec. The current page is automatically opened
in your default browser.
You may need to sign in first (the current user’s credentials are displayed in
the terminal).
To resume the test run, press any key.
For example:
$ bin/rspec spec/features/auto_deploy_spec.rb:34
Running via Spring preloader in process 8999
Run options: include {:locations=>{"./spec/features/auto_deploy_spec.rb"=>[34]}}
Current example is paused for live debugging
The current user credentials are: user2 / 12345678
Press any key to resume the execution of the example!
Back to the example!
.
Finished in 34.51 seconds (files took 0.76702 seconds to load)
1 example, 0 failures
live_debug
only works on JavaScript enabled specs.
Run :js
spec in a visible browser
Run the spec with WEBDRIVER_HEADLESS=0
, like this:
WEBDRIVER_HEADLESS=0 bin/rspec some_spec.rb
The test completes quickly, but this gives you an idea of what’s happening.
Using live_debug
with WEBDRIVER_HEADLESS=0
pauses the open browser, and does not
open the page again. This can be used to debug and inspect elements.
You can also add byebug
or binding.pry
to pause execution and step through
the test.
Screenshots
We use the capybara-screenshot
gem to automatically take a screenshot on
failure. In CI you can download these files as job artifacts.
Also, you can manually take screenshots at any point in a test by adding the methods below. Be sure to remove them when they are no longer needed! See https://github.com/mattheworiordan/capybara-screenshot#manual-screenshots for more.
Add screenshot_and_save_page
in a :js
spec to screenshot what Capybara
“sees”, and save the page source.
Add screenshot_and_open_image
in a :js
spec to screenshot what Capybara
“sees”, and automatically open the image.
The HTML dumps created by this are missing CSS. This results in them looking very different from the actual application. There is a small hack to add CSS which makes debugging easier.
Fast unit tests
Some classes are well-isolated from Rails. You should be able to test them
without the overhead added by the Rails environment and Bundler’s :default
group’s gem loading. In these cases, you can require 'fast_spec_helper'
instead of require 'spec_helper'
in your test file, and your test should run
really fast because:
- Gem loading is skipped
- Rails app boot is skipped
- GitLab Shell and Gitaly setup are skipped
- Test repositories setup are skipped
It takes around one second to load tests that are using fast_spec_helper
instead of 30+ seconds in case of a regular spec_helper
.
fast_spec_helper
also support autoloading classes that are located inside the
lib/
directory. If your class or module is using only
code from the lib/
directory, you don’t need to explicitly load any
dependencies. fast_spec_helper
also loads all ActiveSupport extensions,
including core extensions that are commonly used in the Rails environment.
Note that in some cases, you might still have to load some dependencies using
require_dependency
when a code is using gems or a dependency is not located
in lib/
.
For example, if you want to test your code that is calling the
Gitlab::UntrustedRegexp
class, which under the hood uses re2
library, you
should either:
- Add
require_dependency 're2'
to files in your library that needre2
gem, to make this requirement explicit. This approach is preferred. - Add it to the spec itself.
Alternately, if it is a dependency which is required by many different fast_spec_helper
specs in your domain, and you don’t want to have to manually add the dependency many
times, you can add it to be called directly from fast_spec_helper
itself. To do
this, you can create a spec/support/fast_spec/YOUR_DOMAIN/fast_spec_helper_support.rb
file, and require it from fast_spec_helper
. There are existing examples of this
you can follow.
Use rubocop_spec_helper
for RuboCop related specs.
bin/rspec
. Don’t use bin/spring rspec
as it loads
spec_helper
automatically.Maintaining fast_spec_helper specs
There is a utility script scripts/run-fast-specs.sh
which can be used to run
all specs which use fast_spec_helper
, in various ways. This script is useful
to help identify fast_spec_helper
specs which have problems, such as not
running successfully in isolation. See the script for more details.
subject
and let
variables
The GitLab RSpec suite has made extensive use of let
(along with its strict, non-lazy
version let!
) variables to reduce duplication. However, this sometimes comes at the cost of clarity,
so we need to set some guidelines for their use going forward:
-
let!
variables are preferable to instance variables.let
variables are preferable tolet!
variables. Local variables are preferable tolet
variables. - Use
let
to reduce duplication throughout an entire spec file. - Don’t use
let
to define variables used by a single test; define them as local variables inside the test’sit
block. - Don’t define a
let
variable inside the top-leveldescribe
block that’s only used in a more deeply-nestedcontext
ordescribe
block. Keep the definition as close as possible to where it’s used. - Try to avoid overriding the definition of one
let
variable with another. - Don’t define a
let
variable that’s only used by the definition of another. Use a helper method instead. -
let!
variables should be used only in case if strict evaluation with defined order is required, otherwiselet
suffices. Remember thatlet
is lazy and won’t be evaluated until it is referenced. - Avoid referencing
subject
in examples. Use a named subjectsubject(:name)
, or alet
variable instead, so the variable has a contextual name. - If the
subject
is never referenced inside examples, then it’s acceptable to define thesubject
without a name.
Common test setup
let_it_be
and before_all
do not work with DatabaseCleaner’s deletion strategy. This includes migration specs, Rake task specs, and specs that have the :delete
RSpec metadata tag.
For more information, see issue 420379.In some cases, there is no need to recreate the same object for tests again for each example. For example, a project and a guest of that project are needed to test issues on the same project, so one project and user are enough for the entire file.
As much as possible, do not implement this using before(:all)
or before(:context)
. If you do,
you would need to manually clean up the data as those hooks run outside a database transaction.
Instead, this can be achieved by using
let_it_be
variables and the
before_all
hook
from the test-prof
gem.
let_it_be(:project) { create(:project) }
let_it_be(:user) { create(:user) }
before_all do
project.add_guest(user)
end
This results in only one Project
, User
, and ProjectMember
created for this context.
let_it_be
and before_all
are also available in nested contexts. Cleanup after the context
is handled automatically using a transaction rollback.
Note that if you modify an object defined inside a let_it_be
block,
then you must do one of the following:
- Reload the object as needed.
- Use the
let_it_be_with_reload
alias. - Specify the
reload
option to reload for every example.
let_it_be_with_reload(:project) { create(:project) }
let_it_be(:project, reload: true) { create(:project) }
You can also use the let_it_be_with_refind
alias, or specify the refind
option as well to completely load a new object.
let_it_be_with_refind(:project) { create(:project) }
let_it_be(:project, refind: true) { create(:project) }
Note that let_it_be
cannot be used with factories that has stubs, such as allow
.
The reason is that let_it_be
happens in a before(:all)
block, and RSpec does not
allow stubs in before(:all)
.
See this issue for more details.
To resolve, use let
, or change the factory to not use stubs.
Time-sensitive tests
ActiveSupport::Testing::TimeHelpers
can be used to verify things that are time-sensitive. Any test that exercises or verifies something time-sensitive
should make use of these helpers to prevent transient test failures.
Example:
it 'is overdue' do
issue = build(:issue, due_date: Date.tomorrow)
travel_to(3.days.from_now) do
expect(issue).to be_overdue
end
end
RSpec helpers
You can use the :freeze_time
and :time_travel_to
RSpec metadata tag helpers to help reduce the amount of
boilerplate code needed to wrap entire specs with the ActiveSupport::Testing::TimeHelpers
methods.
describe 'specs which require time to be frozen', :freeze_time do
it 'freezes time' do
right_now = Time.now
expect(Time.now).to eq(right_now)
end
end
describe 'specs which require time to be frozen to a specific date and/or time', time_travel_to: '2020-02-02 10:30:45 -0700' do
it 'freezes time to the specified date and time' do
expect(Time.now).to eq(Time.new(2020, 2, 2, 17, 30, 45, '+00:00'))
end
end
Under the hood, these helpers use the around(:each)
hook and the block syntax of the
ActiveSupport::Testing::TimeHelpers
methods:
around(:each) do |example|
freeze_time { example.run }
end
around(:each) do |example|
travel_to(date_or_time) { example.run }
end
Remember that any objects created before the examples run (such as objects created via let_it_be
) will be outside spec scope.
If the time for everything needs to be frozen, before :all
can be used to encapsulate the setup as well.
before :all do
freeze_time
end
after :all do
unfreeze_time
end
Timestamp truncation
Active Record timestamps are set by the Rails’ ActiveRecord::Timestamp
module using Time.now
.
Time precision is OS-dependent,
and as the docs state, may include fractional seconds.
When Rails models are saved to the database,
any timestamps they have are stored using a type in PostgreSQL called timestamp without time zone
,
which has microsecond resolution—i.e., six digits after the decimal.
So if 1577987974.6472975
is sent to PostgreSQL,
it truncates the last digit of the fractional part and instead saves 1577987974.647297
.
The results of this can be a simple test like:
let_it_be(:contact) { create(:contact) }
data = Gitlab::HookData::IssueBuilder.new(issue).build
expect(data).to include('customer_relations_contacts' => [contact.hook_attrs])
Failing with an error along the lines of:
expected {
"assignee_id" => nil, "...1 +0000 } to include {"customer_relations_contacts" => [{:created_at => "2023-08-04T13:30:20Z", :first_name => "Sidney Jones3" }]}
Diff:
@@ -1,35 +1,69 @@
-"customer_relations_contacts" => [{:created_at=>"2023-08-04T13:30:20Z", :first_name=>"Sidney Jones3" }],
+"customer_relations_contacts" => [{"created_at"=>2023-08-04 13:30:20.245964000 +0000, "first_name"=>"Sidney Jones3" }],
The fix is to ensure we .reload
the object from the database to get the timestamp with correct precision:
let_it_be(:contact) { create(:contact) }
data = Gitlab::HookData::IssueBuilder.new(issue).build
expect(data).to include('customer_relations_contacts' => [contact.reload.hook_attrs])
This explanation was taken from a blog post by Maciek Rząsa.
You can see a merge request where this problem arose and the backend pairing session where it was discussed.
Feature flags in tests
This section was moved to developing with feature flags.
Pristine test environments
The code exercised by a single GitLab test may access and modify many items of data. Without careful preparation before a test runs, and cleanup afterward, a test can change data in a way that affects the behavior of following tests. This should be avoided at all costs! Fortunately, the existing test framework handles most cases already.
When the test environment does get polluted, a common outcome is
flaky tests. Pollution often manifests as an order
dependency: running spec A followed by spec B reliably fails, but running
spec B followed by spec A reliably succeeds. In these cases, you can use
rspec --bisect
(or a manual pairwise bisect of spec files) to determine which
spec is at fault. Fixing the problem requires some understanding of how the test
suite ensures the environment is pristine. Read on to discover more about each
data store!
SQL database
This is managed for us by the database_cleaner
gem. Each spec is surrounded in
a transaction, which is rolled back after the test completes. Certain specs
instead issue DELETE FROM
queries against every table after completion. This
allows the created rows to be viewed from multiple database connections, which
is important for specs that run in a browser, or migration specs, among others.
One consequence of using these strategies, instead of the well-known
TRUNCATE TABLES
approach, is that primary keys and other sequences are not
reset across specs. So if you create a project in spec A, then create a project
in spec B, the first has id=1
, while the second has id=2
.
This means that specs should never rely on the value of an ID, or any other sequence-generated column. To avoid accidental conflicts, specs should also avoid manually specifying any values in these kinds of columns. Instead, leave them unspecified, and look up the value after the row is created.
TestProf in migration specs
Because of what is described above, migration specs can’t be run inside
a database transaction. Our test suite uses
TestProf to improve the runtime of the
test suite, but TestProf
uses database transactions to perform these optimizations.
For this reason, we can’t use TestProf
methods in our migration specs.
These are the methods that should not be used and should be replaced with
default RSpec methods instead:
-
let_it_be
: uselet
orlet!
instead. -
let_it_be_with_reload
: uselet
orlet!
instead. -
let_it_be_with_refind
: uselet
orlet!
instead. -
before_all
: usebefore
orbefore(:all)
instead.
Redis
GitLab stores two main categories of data in Redis: cached items, and Sidekiq
jobs. View the full list of Gitlab::Redis::Wrapper
descendants that are backed by
a separate Redis instance.
In most specs, the Rails cache is actually an in-memory store. This is replaced
between specs, so calls to Rails.cache.read
and Rails.cache.write
are safe.
However, if a spec makes direct Redis calls, it should mark itself with the
:clean_gitlab_redis_cache
, :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state
or
:clean_gitlab_redis_queues
traits as appropriate.
Background jobs / Sidekiq
By default, Sidekiq jobs are enqueued into a jobs array and aren’t processed.
If a test queues Sidekiq jobs and need them to be processed, the
:sidekiq_inline
trait can be used.
The :sidekiq_might_not_need_inline
trait was added when
Sidekiq inline mode was changed to fake mode
to all the tests that needed Sidekiq to actually process jobs. Tests with
this trait should be either fixed to not rely on Sidekiq processing jobs, or their
:sidekiq_might_not_need_inline
trait should be updated to :sidekiq_inline
if
the processing of background jobs is needed/expected.
The usage of perform_enqueued_jobs
is useful only for testing delayed mail
deliveries, because our Sidekiq workers aren’t inheriting from ApplicationJob
/ ActiveJob::Base
.
DNS
DNS requests are stubbed universally in the test suite
(as of !22368), as DNS can
cause issues depending on the developer’s local network. There are RSpec labels
available in spec/support/dns.rb
which you can apply to tests if you need to
bypass the DNS stubbing, like this:
it "really connects to Prometheus", :permit_dns do
And if you need more specific control, the DNS blocking is implemented in
spec/support/helpers/dns_helpers.rb
and these methods can be called elsewhere.
Rate Limiting
Rate limiting is enabled in the test suite. Rate limits
may be triggered in feature specs that use the :js
trait. In most cases, triggering rate
limiting can be avoided by marking the spec with the :clean_gitlab_redis_rate_limiting
trait. This trait clears the rate limiting data stored in Redis cache between specs. If
a single test triggers the rate limit, the :disable_rate_limit
can be used instead.
Stubbing File methods
In the situations where you need to
stub
the contents of a file use the stub_file_read
, and
expect_file_read
helper methods which handle the stubbing for
File.read
correctly. These methods stub File.read
for the given
filename, and also stub File.exist?
to return true
.
If you need to manually stub File.read
for any reason be sure to:
- Stub and call the original implementation for other file paths.
- Then stub
File.read
for only the file path you are interested in.
Otherwise File.read
calls from other parts of the codebase get
stubbed incorrectly.
# bad, all Files will read and return nothing
allow(File).to receive(:read)
# good
stub_file_read(my_filepath, content: "fake file content")
# also OK
allow(File).to receive(:read).and_call_original
allow(File).to receive(:read).with(my_filepath).and_return("fake file_content")
File system
File system data can be roughly split into “repositories”, and “everything else”.
Repositories are stored in tmp/tests/repositories
. This directory is emptied
before a test run starts, and after the test run ends. It is not emptied between
specs, so created repositories accumulate in this directory over the
lifetime of the process. Deleting them is expensive, but this could lead to
pollution unless carefully managed.
To avoid this, hashed storage is enabled in the test suite. This means that repositories are given a unique path that depends on their project’s ID. Because the project IDs are not reset between specs, each spec gets its own repository on disk, and prevents changes from being visible between specs.
If a spec manually specifies a project ID, or inspects the state of the
tmp/tests/repositories/
directory directly, then it should clean up the
directory both before and after it runs. In general, these patterns should be
completely avoided.
Other classes of file linked to database objects, such as uploads, are generally managed in the same way. With hashed storage enabled in the specs, they are written to disk in locations determined by ID, so conflicts should not occur.
Some specs disable hashed storage by passing the :legacy_storage
trait to the
projects
factory. Specs that do this must never override the path
of the
project, or any of its groups. The default path includes the project ID, so it
does not conflict. If two specs create a :legacy_storage
project with the same
path, they use the same repository on disk and lead to test environment
pollution.
Other files must be managed manually by the spec. If you run code that creates a
tmp/test-file.csv
file, for instance, the spec must ensure that the file is
removed as part of cleanup.
Persistent in-memory application state
All the specs in a given rspec
run share the same Ruby process, which means
they can affect each other by modifying Ruby objects that are accessible between
specs. In practice, this means global variables, and constants (which includes
Ruby classes, modules, etc).
Global variables should generally not be modified. If absolutely necessary, a block like this can be used to ensure the change is rolled back afterwards:
around(:each) do |example|
old_value = $0
begin
$0 = "new-value"
example.run
ensure
$0 = old_value
end
end
If a spec needs to modify a constant, it should use the stub_const
helper to
ensure the change is rolled back.
If you need to modify the contents of the ENV
constant, you can use the
stub_env
helper method instead.
While most Ruby instances are not shared between specs, classes
and modules generally are. Class and module instance variables, accessors,
class variables, and other stateful idioms, should be treated in the same way as
global variables. Don’t modify them unless you have to! In particular, prefer
using expectations, or dependency injection along with stubs, to avoid the need
for modifications. If you have no other choice, an around
block like the global
variables example can be used, but avoid this if at all possible.
Elasticsearch specs
Specs that require Elasticsearch must be marked with the :elastic
trait. This
creates and deletes indices before and after all examples.
The :elastic_delete_by_query
trait was added to reduce runtime for pipelines by creating and deleting indices at the
start and end of each context only. The Elasticsearch delete by query API
is used to delete data in all indices (except the migrations index) between examples to ensure a clean index.
The :elastic_clean
trait creates and deletes indices between examples to ensure a clean index. This way, tests are not
polluted with non-essential data. If using the :elastic
or :elastic_delete_by_query
trait
is causing issues, use :elastic_clean
instead. :elastic_clean
is significantly slower than the other traits
and should be used sparingly.
Most tests for Elasticsearch logic relate to:
- Creating data in PostgreSQL and waiting for it to be indexed in Elasticsearch.
- Searching for that data.
- Ensuring that the test gives the expected result.
There are some exceptions, such as checking for structural changes rather than individual records in an index.
Gitlab::Redis::SharedState
.
Therefore, the Elasticsearch traits dynamically use the :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state
trait.
You do not need to add :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state
manually.Specs using Elasticsearch require that you:
- Create data in PostgreSQL and then index it into Elasticsearch.
- Enable Application Settings for Elasticsearch (which is disabled by default).
To do so, use:
before do
stub_ee_application_setting(elasticsearch_search: true, elasticsearch_indexing: true)
end
Additionally, you can use the ensure_elasticsearch_index!
method to overcome the asynchronous nature of Elasticsearch.
It uses the Elasticsearch Refresh API
to make sure all operations performed on an index since the last refresh are available for search. This method is typically
called after loading data into PostgreSQL to ensure the data is indexed and searchable.
You can use the SEARCH_SPEC_BENCHMARK
environment variable to benchmark test setup steps:
SEARCH_SPEC_BENCHMARK=1 bundle exec rspec ee/spec/lib/elastic/latest/merge_request_class_proxy_spec.rb
Test Snowplow events
Gitlab::Tracking
.To catch runtime errors due to type checks you can use expect_snowplow_event
, which checks for
calls to Gitlab::Tracking#event
.
describe '#show' do
it 'tracks snowplow events' do
get :show
expect_snowplow_event(
category: 'Experiment',
action: 'start',
namespace: group,
project: project
)
expect_snowplow_event(
category: 'Experiment',
action: 'sent',
property: 'property',
label: 'label',
namespace: group,
project: project
)
end
end
When you want to ensure that no event got called, you can use expect_no_snowplow_event
.
describe '#show' do
it 'does not track any snowplow events' do
get :show
expect_no_snowplow_event(category: described_class.name, action: 'some_action')
end
end
Even though category
and action
can be omitted, you should at least
specify a category
to avoid flaky tests. For example,
Users::ActivityService
may track a Snowplow event after an API
request, and expect_no_snowplow_event
will fail if that happens to run
when no arguments are specified.
Test Snowplow context against the schema
The Snowplow schema matcher helps to reduce validation errors by testing Snowplow context against the JSON schema. The schema matcher accepts the following parameters:
-
schema path
-
context
To add a schema matcher spec:
- Add a new schema to the Iglu repository,
then copy the same schema to the
spec/fixtures/product_intelligence/
directory. - In the copied schema, remove the
"$schema"
key and value. We do not need it for specs and the spec fails if we keep the key, as it tries to look for the schema in the URL. -
Use the following snippet to call the schema matcher:
match_snowplow_context_schema(schema_path: '<filename from step 1>', context: <Context Hash> )
Table-based / Parameterized tests
This style of testing is used to exercise one piece of code with a comprehensive range of inputs. By specifying the test case once, alongside a table of inputs and the expected output for each, your tests can be made easier to read and more compact.
We use the RSpec::Parameterized gem. A short example, using the table syntax and checking Ruby equality for a range of inputs, might look like this:
describe "#==" do
using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
let(:one) { 1 }
let(:two) { 2 }
where(:a, :b, :result) do
1 | 1 | true
1 | 2 | false
true | true | true
true | false | false
ref(:one) | ref(:one) | true # let variables must be referenced using `ref`
ref(:one) | ref(:two) | false
end
with_them do
it { expect(a == b).to eq(result) }
it 'is isomorphic' do
expect(b == a).to eq(result)
end
end
end
If, after creating a table-based test, you see an error that looks like this:
NoMethodError:
undefined method `to_params'
param_sets = extracted.is_a?(Array) ? extracted : extracted.to_params
^^^^^^^^^^
Did you mean? to_param
That indicates that you need to include the line using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
in the spec file.
where
block. Using procs, stateful
objects, FactoryBot-created objects, and similar items can lead to
unexpected results.Prometheus tests
Prometheus metrics may be preserved from one test run to another. To ensure that metrics are
reset before each example, add the :prometheus
tag to the RSpec test.
Matchers
Custom matchers should be created to clarify the intent and/or hide the
complexity of RSpec expectations. They should be placed under
spec/support/matchers/
. Matchers can be placed in subfolder if they apply to
a certain type of specs only (such as features or requests) but shouldn’t be if
they apply to multiple type of specs.
be_like_time
Time returned from a database can differ in precision from time objects in Ruby, so we need flexible tolerances when comparing in specs.
The PostgreSQL time and timestamp types
have the resolution of 1 microsecond.
However, the precision of Ruby Time
can vary depending on the OS.
Consider the following snippet:
project = create(:project)
expect(project.created_at).to eq(Project.find(project.id).created_at)
On Linux, Time
can have the maximum precision of 9 and
project.created_at
has a value (like 2023-04-28 05:53:30.808033064
) with the same precision.
However, the actual value created_at
(like 2023-04-28 05:53:30.808033
) stored to and loaded from the database
doesn’t have the same precision, and the match would fail.
On macOS X, the precision of Time
matches that of the PostgreSQL timestamp type
and the match could succeed.
To avoid the issue, we can use be_like_time
or be_within
to compare
that times are within one second of each other.
Example:
expect(metrics.merged_at).to be_like_time(time)
Example for be_within
:
expect(violation.reload.merged_at).to be_within(0.00001.seconds).of(merge_request.merged_at)
have_gitlab_http_status
Prefer have_gitlab_http_status
over have_http_status
and
expect(response.status).to
because the former
could also show the response body whenever the status mismatched. This would
be very useful whenever some tests start breaking and we would love to know
why without editing the source and rerun the tests.
This is especially useful whenever it’s showing 500 internal server error.
Prefer named HTTP status like :no_content
over its numeric representation
206
. See a list of supported status codes.
Example:
expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
match_schema
and match_response_schema
The match_schema
matcher allows validating that the subject matches a
JSON schema. The item inside expect
can be
a JSON string or a JSON-compatible data structure.
match_response_schema
is a convenience matcher for using with a
response object. from a request spec.
Examples:
# Matches against spec/fixtures/api/schemas/prometheus/additional_metrics_query_result.json
expect(data).to match_schema('prometheus/additional_metrics_query_result')
# Matches against ee/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/board.json
expect(data).to match_schema('board', dir: 'ee')
# Matches against a schema made up of Ruby data structures
expect(data).to match_schema(Atlassian::Schemata.build_info)
be_valid_json
be_valid_json
allows validating that a string parses as JSON and gives
a non-empty result. To combine it with the schema matching above, use
and
:
expect(json_string).to be_valid_json
expect(json_string).to be_valid_json.and match_schema(schema)
be_one_of(collection)
The inverse of include
, tests that the collection
includes the expected
value:
expect(:a).to be_one_of(%i[a b c])
expect(:z).not_to be_one_of(%i[a b c])
Testing query performance
Testing query performance allows us to:
- Assert that N+1 problems do not exist in a block of code.
- Ensure that the number of queries in a block of code does not increase unnoticed.
QueryRecorder
QueryRecorder
allows profiling and testing of the number of database queries
performed in a given block of code.
See the QueryRecorder
section for more details.
GitalyClient
Gitlab::GitalyClient.get_request_count
allows tests of the number of Gitaly queries
made by a given block of code:
See the Gitaly Request Counts
section for more details.
Shared contexts
Shared contexts only used in one spec file can be declared inline. Any shared contexts used by more than one spec file:
- Should be placed under
spec/support/shared_contexts/
. - Can be placed in subfolder if they apply to a certain type of specs only (such as features or requests) but shouldn’t be if they apply to multiple type of specs.
Each file should include only one context and have a descriptive name, such as
spec/support/shared_contexts/controllers/githubish_import_controller_shared_context.rb
.
Shared examples
Shared examples only used in one spec file can be declared inline. Any shared examples used by more than one spec file:
- Should be placed under
spec/support/shared_examples/
. - Can be placed in subfolder if they apply to a certain type of specs only (such as features or requests) but shouldn’t be if they apply to multiple type of specs.
Each file should include only one context and have a descriptive name, such as
spec/support/shared_examples/controllers/githubish_import_controller_shared_example.rb
.
Helpers
Helpers are usually modules that provide some methods to hide the complexity of
specific RSpec examples. You can define helpers in RSpec files if they’re not
intended to be shared with other specs. Otherwise, they should be placed
under spec/support/helpers/
. Helpers can be placed in a subfolder if they apply
to a certain type of specs only (such as features or requests) but shouldn’t be
if they apply to multiple type of specs.
Helpers should follow the Rails naming / namespacing convention, where
spec/support/helpers/
is the root. For instance
spec/support/helpers/features/iteration_helpers.rb
should define:
# frozen_string_literal: true
module Features
module IterationHelpers
def iteration_period(iteration)
"#{iteration.start_date.to_fs(:medium)} - #{iteration.due_date.to_fs(:medium)}"
end
end
end
Helpers should not change the RSpec configuration. For instance, the helpers module described above should not include:
# bad
RSpec.configure do |config|
config.include Features::IterationHelpers
end
# good, include in specific spec
RSpec.describe 'Issue Sidebar', feature_category: :team_planning do
include Features::IterationHelpers
end
Testing Ruby constants
When testing code that uses Ruby constants, focus the test on the behavior that depends on the constant, rather than testing the values of the constant.
For example, the following is preferred because it tests the behavior of the class method .categories
.
describe '.categories' do
it 'gets CE unique category names' do
expect(described_class.categories).to include(
'deploy_token_packages',
'user_packages',
# ...
'kubernetes_agent'
)
end
end
On the other hand, testing the value of the constant itself, often only repeats the values in the code and the test, which provides little value.
describe CATEGORIES do
it 'has values' do
expect(CATEGORIES).to eq([
'deploy_token_packages',
'user_packages',
# ...
'kubernetes_agent'
])
end
end
In critical cases where an error on a constant could have a catastrophic impact, testing the constant values might be useful as an added safeguard. For example, if it could bring down the entire GitLab service, cause a customer to be billed more than they should be, or cause the universe to implode.
Factories
GitLab uses factory_bot
as a test fixture replacement.
- Factory definitions live in
spec/factories/
, named using the pluralization of their corresponding model (User
factories are defined inusers.rb
). - There should be only one top-level factory definition per file.
- FactoryBot methods are mixed in to all RSpec groups. This means you can (and
should) call
create(...)
instead ofFactoryBot.create(...)
. - Make use of traits to clean up definitions and usages.
- When defining a factory, don’t define attributes that are not required for the resulting record to pass validation.
- When instantiating from a factory, don’t supply attributes that aren’t required by the test.
-
Use implicit, explicit, or inline associations instead of
create
/build
for association setup in callbacks. See issue #262624 for further context.When creating factories with a
has_many
andbelongs_to
association, use theinstance
method to refer to the object being built. This prevents creation of unnecessary records by using interconnected associations.For example, if we have the following classes:
class Car < ApplicationRecord has_many :wheels, inverse_of: :car, foreign_key: :car_id end class Wheel < ApplicationRecord belongs_to :car, foreign_key: :car_id, inverse_of: :wheel, optional: false end
We can create the following factories:
FactoryBot.define do factory :car do transient do wheels_count { 2 } end wheels do Array.new(wheels_count) do association(:wheel, car: instance) end end end end FactoryBot.define do factory :wheel do car { association :car } end end
- Factories don’t have to be limited to
ActiveRecord
objects. See example. - Factories and their traits should produce valid objects that are verified by shared specs run in every model spec.
- Avoid the use of
skip_callback
in factories. See issue #247865 for details.
Fixtures
All fixtures should be placed under spec/fixtures/
.
Repositories
Testing some functionality, such as merging a merge request, requires a Git
repository with a certain state to be present in the test environment. GitLab
maintains the gitlab-test
repository for certain common cases - you can ensure a copy of the repository is
used with the :repository
trait for project factories:
let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
Where you can, consider using the :custom_repo
trait instead of :repository
.
This allows you to specify exactly what files appear in the main
branch
of the project’s repository. For example:
let(:project) do
create(
:project, :custom_repo,
files: {
'README.md' => 'Content here',
'foo/bar/baz.txt' => 'More content here'
}
)
end
This creates a repository containing two files, with default permissions and the specified content.
Configuration
RSpec configuration files are files that change the RSpec configuration (like
RSpec.configure do |config|
blocks). They should be placed under
spec/support/
.
Each file should be related to a specific domain, such as
spec/support/capybara.rb
or spec/support/carrierwave.rb
.
If a helpers module applies only to a certain kind of specs, it should add
modifiers to the config.include
call. For instance if
spec/support/helpers/cycle_analytics_helpers.rb
applies to :lib
and
type: :model
specs only, you would write the following:
RSpec.configure do |config|
config.include Spec::Support::Helpers::CycleAnalyticsHelpers, :lib
config.include Spec::Support::Helpers::CycleAnalyticsHelpers, type: :model
end
If a configuration file only consists of config.include
, you can add these
config.include
directly in spec/spec_helper.rb
.
For very generic helpers, consider including them in the spec/support/rspec.rb
file which is used by the spec/fast_spec_helper.rb
file. See
Fast unit tests for more details about the
spec/fast_spec_helper.rb
file.
Test environment logging
Services for the test environment are automatically configured and started when tests are run, including Gitaly, Workhorse, Elasticsearch, and Capybara. When run in CI, or if the service needs to be installed, the test environment logs information about set-up time, producing log messages like the following:
==> Setting up Gitaly...
Gitaly set up in 31.459649 seconds...
==> Setting up GitLab Workhorse...
GitLab Workhorse set up in 29.695619 seconds...
fatal: update refs/heads/diff-files-symlink-to-image: invalid <newvalue>: 8cfca84
From https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-test
* [new branch] diff-files-image-to-symlink -> origin/diff-files-image-to-symlink
* [new branch] diff-files-symlink-to-image -> origin/diff-files-symlink-to-image
* [new branch] diff-files-symlink-to-text -> origin/diff-files-symlink-to-text
* [new branch] diff-files-text-to-symlink -> origin/diff-files-text-to-symlink
b80faa8..40232f7 snippet/multiple-files -> origin/snippet/multiple-files
* [new branch] testing/branch-with-#-hash -> origin/testing/branch-with-#-hash
==> Setting up GitLab Elasticsearch Indexer...
GitLab Elasticsearch Indexer set up in 26.514623 seconds...
This information is omitted when running locally and when no action needs to be performed. If you would always like to see these messages, set the following environment variable:
GITLAB_TESTING_LOG_LEVEL=debug